View Single Post
06-29-2013, 12:04 AM
Checked out
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hiking
Country: Canada
Posts: 48,856
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Psycho Dad View Post
Try using PK min/game, or his actual place in the depth chart for PKers. He is not one of the main PKers. He did okay, but don't pretend like he's all of a sudden shutting down the opponent's PP1, because he's not. And I'm not denigrating anything. He is what he is, and his accomplishments are moderate, aside from the 8 point game. He's not a $5M/year guy, at all. Not even close.
Why do that? Harpoon is right to use the total mins spent on pk in the year. One of the things Gagner offers is seldom being out of the lineup (even if injured) and providing the club with the optimal amount of GP he does.

If you use per game you specifically take that GP benefit out of the occasion. But for what reason?

PK benefit served to team is pk benefit served to team. Thats total minutes on that unit.

Anyway, people wanted a breakdown of Gagner shorthanded this season.

76mins on ice for 3GFON 4GAON, had 2 shorthanded pts, leading the team, and was practically even at PK for his duration of minutes. The best numbers of anybody on the club shorthanded and its not even close. He was -.078/60mins for 4 on 5 hockey. Shawn Horcoff was -4.72 Belanger was -6.91. ps in the exact same amount of pk time as Gagner Horc was scored against 6 times and with zero GFON in his pk minutes. Belanger of course had no GFON in his appreciable pk minutes and was scored against 9 times.

Doesn't matter, people won't like those numbers anyway, even though they are the numbers.

Last edited by Replacement*: 06-29-2013 at 12:09 AM.
Replacement* is offline