View Single Post
Old
06-29-2013, 01:44 AM
  #69
zxcvnm
Registered User
 
zxcvnm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Remember SammyJankis
Country: United States
Posts: 568
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baer Hug View Post
How about instead of offering picks from this years draft the flames offer the aves their first round pick in 2013+first round pick 2014? The lineup the flames plan on icing next year is terrible. That 2014 pick is destined to be 30th overall next year. Do the aves trade mackinnon for monahan/ lindholm this year plus Aaron ekblad/Sam reinhart next year?
If you could get Florida or Tampa Bay into the discussion, then something might be workable. It should be pretty clear from the fact that the Avs have been pretty adamant about staying in the top 3, that they are risk adverse (going for nearly sure things even if other options might be better in the long run - i.e., Seth Jones). Because the 2014 pick has no certainty to it, the Avs would not accept it to drop out of the top 3. I'm not saying it's not fair value - just that the Avs won't do it.

But here's the other point: there's no way Calgary should make the offer. Why potentially lose out on a solid pick this year and Ekblad next year just for MacKinnon this year? You need to fill out a team and putting all your eggs into a single basket at this point would prolong your rebuild.

zxcvnm is offline   Reply With Quote