View Single Post
06-29-2013, 10:41 AM
Registered User
bleedblue94's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,344
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Tawnos View Post
I believe it's against federal workplace regulations. You're firing a guy and giving him a severance package while being injured from performing his job.
it can't be bc of federal law, it was well documented during the lockout that the dynamics of the nhl and nhlpa side stepped federal law since technically a salary cap is a federal violation. the no buyout for injured players is something the nhlpa probably demanded so guys w longer term injuries wouldn't get bought out and then either miss out on jobs or be muscled into taking smaller contracts bc of health uncertainty which would have an indirect potential affect of holding salaries down or trapping guys into one year deals

bleedblue94 is offline