View Single Post
06-30-2013, 11:33 PM
Registered User
hockeyfreak7's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 9,019
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by phlocky View Post
The difference between him and a dman ranked in the early to mid 20's was not significant enough to be worried about moving back. THAT'S the point of this.
Wait, so you're saying Holmgren should have judged a trade based on rankings? You realize we would have ended up with a much ****tier defender if we did that, right? We might have even been forced to take Hagg in the first round if we traded down to the 20s.

What the hell would the point of that be? Especially with the gift of hindsight, how can you complain about how that worked out when you know it would have been worse had we traded down?

hockeyfreak7 is offline   Reply With Quote