View Single Post
07-01-2013, 04:40 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,718
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Josh3217 View Post
I'd rather have a mean bottom 6 player that may only score 10 goals but brings a lot more to the table than a small and soft bottom 6 player that scores say 16 goals.
I agree.

The first guy is the one that can score the big goal in a tough playoff series. Helps wear the other team down.

The second guy is the one who can look good during the regular season but might be a perimeter player come playoff time.

These are generalizations for sure. What the Rangers really need is a good mix of both. That is what the best teams down through the years have had and this year was no exception. Chicago had skill, but they also had plenty of size and snarl.

Pizza is offline   Reply With Quote