View Single Post
07-06-2013, 11:44 AM
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,301
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
Excellent post.

Of course the most obvious problem here for Ference is we don't have anything close to Chara and we don't have a bonafide first pairing or shutdown pair so theres always going to be temptation to utilize Ference beyond his accustomed means. Ference has always looked down the bench and had better D than him that shouldered the worst of the load.
Additionally a lot is said about where Ference has fit in past clubs. In Boston, even though he could be 3rd, 4th in minutes at times having a guy like Chara in the lineup is almost like having two D in the ranks ahead of you. A guy that plays first and second pairing a lot of the time. This is what Pronger gave us as well.

People should reflect always on how much better ordinary mortal D looked in the presence of greatness. Bergeron never looked better. Several of our D never looked better. None of these people never again found the success they had with Pronger.

The Ference one see's in Boston is not the Ference we will see here. He won't look steady, he'll make mistakes, get out of plays, struggle, GA will increase. But he will be physical, will bring an edge, and it will be a benefit in that way. This is not a steady D, and won't be a shutdown guy here. I would be very surprised if he's able to ramp that up and if he somehow does it would be the best acquisition of the summer.
That's why I'm still hoping for Coburn.

Again; not Pronger or Chara, but I think you then have a fairly balanced blueline with five guys who can, to varying degrees, shoulder a bit of the heavy-lifting.

To go back to the 2006 well again; it would be a similar set up to the Hurricanes who rolled with Hedican/Wesley/Commodore/Kaberle/Ward/Etc.

DisgruntledGoat* is offline   Reply With Quote