View Single Post
07-07-2013, 12:12 PM
Registered User
SnapVirus's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mtl., QC.
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,540
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Impossible Glory View Post
Silfverberg >> Collberg at this point. More proven, already in the NHL, at least as much talent as Colbberg. Noesen also has more potential than Leblanc (because of hi down year, even if I think that he'll bounce back). It's not because two players have been selected around the same rank in different draft that they are equal in term of value.

It's not a good argument to say "Well, we just could have put those pieces together and we would have Ryan. Bergevin's soooo bad". Doesn't works this way.

To beat Ottawa's offer, we would have had to give something like Eller, Collberg and 1st in my opinion. But that's debatable.
Its easy for Silfverberg to have more NHL impact, hes 4 years older. At the same age, their stats were almost identical. Thats why I said we dont have a ROSTER PLAYER comparable.

Noesen is nothing else than a throw in. He dosent have real value, like Leblanc. Do he has more 'potential' at this state? Yes. But what the **** is potential? Every player when they are drafted have potential, but only 5-10 1st rounders pan out. Noesen regressed and his closer to Leblanc's value, than Gallagher, man.

SnapVirus is offline   Reply With Quote