Alex Galchenyuk Thread 11.0 - Logo Kissing Edition
View Single Post
07-08-2013, 01:48 PM
One Country United!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Land of the Habs
Originally Posted by
It make no sense for a team like Boston, who already had a strong leadership group, to use the "sink or swim" approach with a rookie. Teams who give big responsibilities to rookies are the one who don't already have leadership - and thus, don't have any other choice than to trust a rookie.
"I'm not motivated to get better because I don't have responsibilities" is the kind of antics a inexperienced teenager would use. The world doesn't work like that. Sure, there are exceptions, but these are precisely exceptions.
I agree in principle.
Galchenyuk would be an exception. He stepped in the league when he was 18... When forwards make the jump to the NHL they're often 22. If they're a Center in the AHL, they play Center in the NHL.
Galchenyuk was in an unnatural situation. He was played at a position with less responsibilities. He was given sheltered minutes. He was babied in a way Toews, Malkin, Backstrom, Staal and other top-3 drafted Centers were not when they stepped in the NHL. That was fine and I was OK with it last season. The question is how much longer can this go on until it starts being detrimental. You can't deliberately stunt growth to protect a player because he's younger.
You don't grow leaders by treating players like babies.
Last edited by Erik Estrada: 07-08-2013 at
View Public Profile
Erik Estrada's albums
Find More Posts by Erik Estrada