View Single Post
07-09-2013, 07:51 PM
Registered User
Curufinwe's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 14,037
vCash: 50
Kimmo was getting what might be his last ever NHL contract and it was for one year. Giroux got an eight year deal with most of the money in the first five years.

Originally Posted by MsWoof View Post
Kimmo also didn't give any kind of discount for next year. Why should either of them do management a favour when they were locked out earlier this season? We, as fans, may have mostly forgotten but they didn't get paid for several months because their owners locked them out. There is no reason for any player to give their owner a break.
I think Malkin did because he could have got 10m as a free agent, but took less so there was more cap room to fill out the rest of the team.

Last edited by Curufinwe: 07-09-2013 at 07:56 PM.
Curufinwe is online now   Reply With Quote