Thread: Scott Laughton
View Single Post
Old
07-09-2013, 09:48 PM
  #62
Random Forest
aka hockeyfreak7
 
Random Forest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 13,744
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by poneill27 View Post
Every day I pray, to the Old Gods and The New, that Laughton goes back to jr for 1 more year for all the reasons in this post.
Love the reference, but I have to disagree.

I don't think another year in juniors is going to stunt his offensive growth. He's not a skill player, so he doesn't need to develop the confidence in his talent level like a Schenn or a Strome or a Scheifele. Those guys needed the extra time in order to gain the confidence in their ability.

Laughton's skill set takes much less refining to translate to the NHL. Players like him develop through pro experience. His offensive game is going to come along by learning what the pro game is all about. Not gaining confidence in his skills.

Now, if you want to talk about a player whose offensive game could have used another year or two in juniors, I think we're looking at Couturier. He's a great player and still has loads of potential, but I fear his offensive game may have been stunted by not getting that extra year or two. He could obviously still reach his potential, but it's clear that he has very little confidence in his offensive game, and I think another year would have done wonders for him in that regard.

I don't fear the same issue with Laughton as he doesn't have the same offensive talent level or skill set that Couturier does.

Random Forest is offline   Reply With Quote