Miscellaneous NHL Talk Part VIII
View Single Post
07-11-2013, 04:21 PM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by
Philly Ducks: sounds great but it's still a 35+ contract, would still be against our cap.
But if they both void the contract, it is no longer existing, so how can they enforce the 35+ rule, unless they'd void EVERY part of that contract except for the 35+ part? Why didn't Luongo and Vancouver both just void his contract last season, when Luo said he would get rid of his contract if he could, I just think this is going to be a slippery slope if they start allowing this to happen.
Last edited by Philadelphia Ducks: 07-11-2013 at
View Public Profile
Philadelphia Ducks's albums
Find More Posts by Philadelphia Ducks