Thread: Speculation: Evander Kane
View Single Post
07-13-2013, 01:46 PM
carrying the flag
Viqsi's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 21,256
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Originally Posted by ThirdManIn View Post
If the asking price happened to actually be Josi, Forsberg and a 1st I would laugh so hard it would kill me. Kane is not that good, though I wouldn't be surprised if his value to his club was that high.
It's an extreme example; I'm aware he's not that good. The point I was getting at is that blithe whining about "he's just too much of a ***** to give up the needed assets to Get The Deal Done" in the absence of context is patently absurd.

See, I'm willing to bet that when folks make that complaint, it's because they're convinced that if they tack on just one more piece that hurts depth slightly, then that constitutes "enough pain for us" and therefore it's the way to close the deal, but that folks who don't like that "pain" are going to not have the strength of character to do that. When in fact the usual "pain" required isn't in terms of more depth players given up, but players higher up on the depth chart - it's not "Ellis + 1st and we'll just have to stretch to include Beck BUT IT WILL BE WORTH IT", it's "Jones + 1st".

I suspect that manages to evade a lot of people, despite the fact that it's demonstrated repeatedly in plain sight on T&R every single time every fan of The Other Team makes a counteroffer.

Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote