View Single Post
Old
07-15-2013, 06:45 PM
  #117
Crumblin Erb Brooks
Registered User
 
Crumblin Erb Brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Grenyarnia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,969
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintAnton View Post
Not sure if it needs to be explained again essentially their list he's refering too doesnt include players they wouldnt be able to draft. So 1-2 on the list likely were Monahan and Lindholm with the top 4 being all but set. After that guys who could never fall out of the top 15 ex. Nurse, Ristolainen, Horvat, Nichushkin, would not be on the list.

So they likely had Poirier as ~18-20 and Klimchuck as ~21-24
Ive never heard of this, but it seems like a silly way to evaluate/organize prospects for the draft.

Ranking players based on the likelihood you think they could fall to your pick rather than their talent level. Did they really just ignore players that they knew were going to go between their first and second 1st rounders? They had 3 first rounders, if they really liked a prospect, they could have easily moved up to get someone in the middle of the first round.

Crumblin Erb Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote