View Single Post
Old
10-29-2006, 03:46 PM
  #27
habitue*
 
habitue*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,252
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick Nick View Post
Plekanec and Johnson excelled together in pre-season. The reason why Bonk-Bégin were separated in the first place was because we needed a D and have traded Ribs, Pleks has moved up, so has Bonk.

The third line would not suffer from it, while the fourth line would gain a lot. Bégin is a better player with Bonk, and it gives a lot more flexibilty to Latendresse. Big, physical line with good defensive awerness and good scoring potential. What's wrong?


Rioght now, playing Bégin on a fourth line is a waste. I'd rather see him on left wing with Bonk and Johnson.

Lapierre also deserves a call back.

MY lines

Higgins-Koivu-Ryder (no explanation required)
Samsonov-Kovalev-Perezhogin (give them a fair chance)
Bégin-Bonk-Johnson (perfect combo)
Latendresse-Plekanec-Lapierre (size, youth and energy)
Murray-Downey

habitue* is offline   Reply With Quote