: Confirmed with Link:
Blackhawks re-sign Ryan Stanton to a one-year contract
View Single Post
07-16-2013, 05:03 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Originally Posted by
The Hawks don't need to make any more moves.
However, with Carcillo gone, if the Stanton contract proves to be a one-way deal, something's up in Chicago. We don't need any more additions, but if Stanley thinks his plan makes the Hawks better, go for it.
Chicago fans are too eager to think, "something's up". I've been saying all off-season that people shouldn't be surprised to see Chicago trade Carcillo/Brookbank, like I said that people shouldn't be surprised to see Chicago trade Frolik after they moved Bolland.
Carcillo has been/will be replaced by Ben Smith. So there's no need to have him on the roster. Brookbank's getting paid 1.25M to be a #7 Dman.. why would Chicago pay that when they could sign Stanton (as they have) to around 600K, and get a player about as good?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HockeySensible