C Mark Jankowski - Providence College, NCAA (2012, 21st, CGY)
View Single Post
07-16-2013, 08:54 PM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Originally Posted by
It's unnecessary that they have a list which focuses on players likely available at the teams draft position?
I'm no Feaster fan, but come on. Now I've heard everything
I still dont understand why the second list is necessary. If they have a list ranking all of the players (or of at least the players that they rated highly), what is the point of the second list? The order doesnt change.
Over the course of a season, they inevitably scouted players that were going to be going in that 5-15 range. You arent saying that they eliminated those prospects from their list later in the season because they werent likely to be available.
Im not trying to be a hater on Feaster, and as I said, I am sure they are telling half truths, but you rank players based on the likelihood that they become good NHL players. I think its silly to eliminate players from your list just because they wont be available at your second pick, especially when you have pieces to move up if they really liked a player. Especially in a draft with a well defined Top 9 or 10 players.
View Public Profile
Redgren Grumbholdt's albums
Find More Posts by Redgren Grumbholdt