View Single Post
07-17-2013, 05:46 PM
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sherbrooke
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,673
vCash: 450
Originally Posted by WhiskeySeven View Post
Fully agreed, it's about that time where I really soured on Bergevin. Prior to that Subban seemed like a great bargain but then Desharnais and Bouillon were extended in very reckless manner and Bergevin's coup appeared to be more of a turd.

Bingo. I don't have a problem with how Bergevin handled Subban myself, I actually agree with 417 that it's not all that big of a talking point in the first place, i.e. why is there such a commotion about this. I would say, however, that I was quite skeptical about giving Desharnais his contract just a few months later, in a year where Desharnais showed his limitations. At that point, I was wondering where the principle went rather than the actual cap ramifications.

BLASPHEMOUS is offline