Thread: Value of: Tatar to Buffalo
View Single Post
07-23-2013, 10:24 PM
Registered User
stokes84's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 14,982
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to stokes84
Originally Posted by ZeroPT View Post
How so? The G's are a fundamental part of our rebuild, armia is our only dynamic offensive winger prospect and Hodgson is our future 2c. Meanwhile pysyk,Ennis,Leduc and thought maybe Tatar could be included in a deal for vanek.
You feel the need to hold onto Armia because he is a dynamic, young winger, but have no issue throwing away Ennis who is a dynamic, young wing/center who has already proven he can play. You call Hodgson our future #2, but then why are Grigs/Girgs so important? Aren't they are future 1and 2? A future 3 isn't something that is unmovable. How do you put Leduc in that category? He's barely a prospect. It feels very scattered, like you just picked your favorite players.

stokes84 is offline   Reply With Quote