Thread: Value of: Mtl and Washington
View Single Post
Old
07-24-2013, 11:01 PM
  #27
capitalsrock
Registered User
 
capitalsrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 2,582
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Partisan du CH View Post
That's a ridiculous argument. We don't need a 50-60 points center because we already have other offensive players? And you think it's a problem to have too many offensive players??? And to solve that "problem", you're willing to trade him for a guy that has less value, that is less useful, who's overpaid and who's 6 years older?

Look at Pittsburgh. They have Crosby and Malkin. Too much offense! They should solve that "problem" by giving Malkin for a 2nd line winger instead.

Oh well. At least Montreal's "problem" is not that big. They are not stuck with offensive "problems" like Crosby and Malkin. All they have is Plekanec-Desharnais-Eller. But that's still too much offense for you, right?

By the way, Desharnais has never been tried on the wing. So how can you say he's terrible at that position???
the problem is not too much offense but too little defense and physicality. plus mojo is better so caps dont need desharnais

capitalsrock is offline   Reply With Quote