Richards vs Yeo
View Single Post
07-25-2013, 03:12 PM
The Brodin Effect
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a tree stand.
Originally Posted by
The argument started that Yeo was given a re-building team while Richards was not. My intent was that Richards had two years of a crappy hockey team while Yeo only had one.
Under Richards, the Wild finished 22nd and 21st overall. Under Yeo, the Wild finished 24th. Then he was given Parise and Suter along with several young prospects.
IMO, the Wild started re-building the minute Riser was fired. Fletcher had to come in and evaluate what we had and how to best move forward. In order to that, he had to see the team on the ice to see where the current deficiencies were.
So, Richards was given a team that was just starting the process of re-building, and Yeo came in about mid-way through that process.
I would say the re-build is now complete. Anything less than making the playoffs should be considered a fire-able offense for someone (most likely Yeo).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MuckOG