Chris Gibson (G)
View Single Post
08-01-2013, 11:46 AM
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R'Lyeh, Antarctica
Originally Posted by
To be fair, what could really be said about Jonathan Quick two years after being drafted? A .929 in NCAA where plenty of goalies post >.920 svp. Ok....
Even after 3 years you'd be looking at a .855 NHL svp, .905 ECHL svp goalie, not somebody that inspired much confidence.
I do kinda agree, still shocked that teams passed on Patrik Bartosak last year...
Right but Quick definately falls into that long-term development category, I guess the point I was trying to make was that no where in the 2011 draft has there or does there appear to be anytime soon seem like there is a Price, Mason, Bernier, Fleury, Varlamov, or any other guy that comes out of Juniors or Europe, NHL ready a couple years after he's drafted. All of the goalies from that year look like long-term projects like Quick was right now. Just pointed out what looks like a huge lack of high end goalies from that draft year.
Yeah Bartosak sort of came out of nowhere, was he even ranked for the 2011 or 2012 draft?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by tigermask48