View Single Post
08-01-2013, 03:13 PM
Kriss E
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 34,106
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NotProkofievian View Post
This article was bad to its very core, so far as forecasting goes. Somewhere, an actuary is pissing him or herself having read this.

I mean, the NHL and NHLPA were fighting over whether 4% was sustainable over the course of the next CBA, ffs. And we have stooges here saying that over twice that might be a touch conservative.

You really can publish just about anything about hockey so long as you put some numbers in it, and be reasonably certain that it'll be accepted by its audience.
I just love the conclusion I can take out of this article. In order for this (the bridge deal) to make sense, I need to assume some unrealistic things will happen.

Kriss E is offline   Reply With Quote