View Single Post
Old
01-11-2004, 07:37 PM
  #63
jfont
Registered User
 
jfont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 15,407
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie
With all due respect, you need to take a more objective approach towards the Kings. Vlad knows what he is talking about and, really, he is bang on.

Is Taylor a good GM? Without question.

Is Taylor one of the best GM's at making trades? Without question.

Is Taylor one of the best 3 GM's? Not yet. The fact is the Kings have accomplished NOTHING under Taylor's tenure. Yes, injuries and bad luck have played a role in this. Yes, the Kings are in a better position now than they were prior to hiring Taylor. Yes, the Kings have one of the better groups of prospects in the league.

However, that does not make Taylor a top-3 GM. I have no doubt that Taylor has the potential to become a top-3 GM in the league (it is readily apparent that Taylor is one of the better minds in hockey right now) but until the Kings start consistently winning as a franchise like the Devils do, Taylor cannot be considered one of the best GM's hockey.

Success speaks volumes. And the Kings are sorely lacking in that department right now.
willie, you always write what i think...you da man!

__________________
Due to budget cuts, the light at the end of the tunnel will be turned off
jfont is offline