Who is better
View Single Post
01-12-2004, 03:53 PM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Originally Posted by
Perezhogin doesn't deserve to be ahead of many good prospects right now, including Woywitka.
He's been very slow to adjust to North American play, he's a fairly plain player, not terribly creative, and doesn't work hard enough.
I interviewed him once, and he's a bit of a weird kid - kind of laid back and he plays laid back too. I don't think he'll be a great player.
i dunno doc... usually i'm all about your analysis but this guy has had success everywhere he's played and he's been a lot better lately and although i'm not sure how good he'll turn up... i just think he'll atleast be a good 2nd line player if he gets support...
as for everyone picking vaananen over ribeiro... i dunno, maybe its just been because i've seen more of ribeiro ( i live in mtl) than vaananen (whom i haven't seen that much of) but he's our leading scorer, he's getting better every game, he's got more points that players like lecavalier, richards, gagne, bonk, etc... and he's got a lot less of a supporting cast than any of those guys
i guess grebeshkov (but i dont think for long)
wowitka (because he's older mostly... alex has a higher ceiling by far)
hamhuis (he's further along )
parise (although i think both wil be solid pros - ALL you kings fans will regret passing on this guy IMO)
btw, why so much hab haters?
i almost get the feeling we could put a poll of whos better between komi and mike van ryn and most of you would vote for van ryn...
View Public Profile
Papa Bear's albums
Find More Posts by Papa Bear