View Single Post
Old
08-19-2013, 08:56 AM
  #143
Sheeshta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 163
vCash: 500
The point I was trying (poorly) to make re: the kids getting better isn't whether or not the team will be better if all of the kids improve: it will be, though how much better is a question. I'm saying that it's massively unlikely that that actually, you know, happens. There are a bunch of ifs going into next season:

If Nuge returns to form after surgery
If the Hall at centre experiment works well enough to get the team through an unbelievably tough October schedule that they're not in a five game hole by Nov. 1
If J. Schultz manages to better his offensive output while improving his atrocious defence and doesn't sophomore slump
If Yak manages to improve his offensive output while improving his atrocious defence and doesn't sophomore slump
If Eakins is an actual NHL coach
If the Oilers brass are sudden geniuses and Joensuu, Hamilton, Grebeshkov and Belov are actually all NHL players somehow
If Gordon is the real deal and not a product of playing in PHX & with David Moss

then everything is great in Oilers town. However:

If Hall goes down again in classic Hall fashion
If Nuge goes down again or struggles for the first 20 games back
If Smyth regresses even further
If Hemsky disappears entirely in a 3rd line sulk
etc. etc.

then we're right back where we started. You can't just expect all of the positive ifs to happen and none of the negatives. I mean, you can, sure, but I'll think you're weird.

Sheeshta is online now   Reply With Quote