View Single Post
09-02-2013, 07:18 PM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,257
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Raspewtin View Post
what's your definition of legit first liner? like Blue Blooded said, if your first line know each other well, have good qualities, and feed off each other's skill, they're good enough to be a first line. I'd take that Hagelin-Stepan-Nash line over Nash-Richards-Gaborik 10x out of 10. And those three are legitimate first liners, I guess.
Personally, I'd want 2 legitimate first liners so you can separate them in a pinch. Right now, the Rangers have 1 and a half.

That Gaborik-Richards-Nash thing wound up being a disaster because Gaborik played out of position and didnt play like a first liner, and Richards simply didnt play like a 1st liner at any point in the season.

A first liner is like pornography - you know it when you see it.

Bleed Ranger Blue is online now   Reply With Quote