Brett Hull cup clinching goal: Goal or no goal?
View Single Post
09-06-2013, 10:03 AM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Originally Posted by
meticulous explanation of why the goal was legal. with pictures.
This explanation only came out after this goal occurred.
There were goals being disallowed in the playoffs all over the place which is why there was such a surprise about this one. (I can remember Moreau having a "toe in the crease")
Not to mention, personally, I find it hard to be convinced conclusively of possession using static pictures. If the puck is touching the stick, it doesn't mean possession.
The NHL argued that the shot, rebound, kick, and rebound again was one possession as he's moving through the crease.
I think they're covering their *****.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NyQuil