Thread: Team toughness
View Single Post
Old
09-06-2013, 03:18 PM
  #78
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 29,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaalWars View Post
Asham was not on the Pens Stanley Cup winning team and I don't think Rupp played for them in those playoffs.

But, to your point, I'm not saying those guys aren't important. I'm just saying that they're not winning championships without the stars ahead of them on the depth chart. This franchise should start worrying about it's bottom 6 when it actually has a top 6 capable of competing for a championship. I'm not of the opinion we currently have that. Every single one of those teams was capable of producing multiple studs at forward. We haven't been able to produce even one. Granted, that's largely because we didn't have the luxury of drafting Crosby/Malkin/Toews/Kane etc. but I see the general narrative of the Rangers franchise up to this point post- (long) lockout as:

1. Have the best goaltender in the world
2. Have a solid defensive core
3. Consistently lack offensive firepower despite trying every offseason to find a remedy.

Toughness really should be far down on the list of this team's concerns. Sometimes I wonder if the people overly worried about toughness watched this team in the mid to late 90's. Those teams were made of Charmin.
The stars ahead of them are very important, of course. No one is arguing that point. What I am arguing is that this team is lacking the ability to stand up for itself by way of dropping the gloves.

Obviously it can't be quantified. I consider it a part of the game today and it has been proven by quite a few teams who play on the edge and win games.

NYR Viper is offline