View Single Post
Old
09-09-2013, 06:07 AM
  #104
oilphan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post
tbh I thought he was ineffectual. Kid reminded me somewhat of another guy that seems very visible, seems to be busy and do a lot, but without accomplishing much of anything. Name is Omark, maybe you've seen him.

Its a results based business.
Interesting. Most Omark detractors say that he was ineffectual despite his strong numbers. 26 points in 51 games is a pretty decent year in the nhl. I fail to see the correlation between the two players.

If in fact it is a results based business, and you want finish, Omark certainly deserves his shot again. His better than .5 ppg in 2010-11 is better than the average NHLer.

I think this just shows that there is always a way to spin in a positive or negative way. I'm sure you will have a reason why another set of numbers shows otherwise.

oilphan is offline