View Single Post
09-09-2013, 10:14 PM
sansabri's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saint-Hubert, QC
Country: Palestine
Posts: 18,974
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Cogburn View Post
How would Sather and Holmgren get a "maybe" and Gillis gets labelled as "bad"? Same results, but the Canucks haven't had to take a year off to rebuild.

Bergevin and Nonis would need some more time before I make up my minds either way, and Edmonton's Lowe/Mactavish situation gets some time too.

Chiarelli, Holland and Shero are the "best", with Stan Bowman a half step below them (due to having a "pending/potential" mess he will sort out and navigating the sorta mess Tallon left cap wise).
because Sather is pretty savvy when it comes to trades. you gotta give him that.

Holmgren is crazy, but he's built some very solid teams. almost had himself a ring.

i'd put Nonis in the 'bad' for the Luongo/Schneider fiasco. that thing lasted over 2 years.

sansabri is offline   Reply With Quote