View Single Post
Old
09-12-2013, 12:58 PM
  #131
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,703
vCash: 500
Nash is who most of us thought he was when the trade rumors first popped up. A good player, not a super star player. That he came close to a point per game last year I consider a success, and at the same time find that he was disappointing in the playoffs for the most part.

That said, most players outside of Lundqvist, Brassard, and Zucarello were disappointing in the playoffs.

The lack of depth obviously hurt the Rangers despite acquiring Nash, but Gaborik playing like complete ****, Richards struggling, Staal getting injured, etc, played a huge role in the underachieving last year as well. If Gaborik has a "normal" year then things look a lot better.

Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote