Most of Nash's goals are meaningless...
View Single Post
09-12-2013, 08:17 PM
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: New Jersey
Originally Posted by
without nash we dont make the playoffs. dubi and arty as good as they are could not have made up for the offense that was missing because richards and gaborik took the year off. nash and hank carried this team to the playoffs, stepan also helped by having an awesome season. in the playoffs nash and hank both underperformed. nash was bad in the playoffs and hank was average. although hank won us a series based on his later play, i think if he was on his game we couldve won it earlier. as far as nash goes, yes he needs to be better if we wan to win. however if you look at toews, ovechkin or kopitar, you can see that its not uncommon for offensive stars to be shutdown in the playoffs when you play teams that focus on you specifically. leading scorers and difference makers are usually depth players when it comes to the playoffs.
I agree with everything about Nash, but Hank was just awesome. He can't do it all himself.
12 GP - 3 SO - 2.14 GAA - .934 SV%
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aufheben