View Single Post
Old
09-23-2013, 02:50 PM
  #62
GAGLine
Registered User
 
GAGLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,043
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Off Sides View Post
No, I am insisting that the Rangers should have left space for a long term deal for Stepan.

The other moves they made, whether this off-season or in off-season's past as well as next year's off-season are the cause of them only offering a 2 year deal because that is what crafted this finely tuned plan of theirs.
You keep saying different things. Did they plan to only give him 2 years and then spend their money accordingly? Or did they spend their money and then decide to only give him 2 years? If you think it's the latter, you're mistaken.

GAGLine is online now   Reply With Quote