View Single Post
Old
09-23-2013, 10:02 PM
  #92
dackelljuneaubulis02
Registered User
 
dackelljuneaubulis02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,041
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
The point is that he's not a player that they're going to lean on for offensive contribution, so no sense in using "extra" years attempting to develop it further. If you have a guy pegged for your bottom 6 in the short/mid-term, and he's ready for that role, you don't send him down to the minors to "round out his skill set" if he's already one of your best options.

Basically, it's unlikely that he'd be asked to carry the offense down in Hamilton, and he's never going to be asked to do it with the Habs anyway, so why waste time if he's hungry and ready? He'll naturally climb up the depth chart if he continues to improve from here and chip in offensively, but you look at the other guys we have coming through the pipeline and it's probably best to face facts.
sure we'll never lean on Bournival for points but why does that preclude trying to get more offense from him?

With this preseason, I doubt the organization has him pegged for the bottom 6, case closed. He's shown improvement in his shot so giving him time to actually put up points in Hamilton can help more than hurt.

He could still be effective on a 4th line it seems but it's really starting to look like there's more to his game.

Either way seems fine but I just think there's more positives to him playing in Hamilton.

dackelljuneaubulis02 is offline   Reply With Quote