2nd line centre..why not Higgins?
View Single Post
11-26-2006, 03:23 PM
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Asbestos, Qc
Originally Posted by
I like it and I think it's possible we could see something like that. They aren't going to give up on Samsonov as quickly as I have.
If Dandenault is up front that means Streit is in the lineup up full-time, probably with Bouillon. That's a pretty small pairing. Streit has improved, but I don't trust him still.
I would change things and get some size in there.
Instead of having Streit and Samosonov in the lineup, I would put Lapierre in there.
You know, the fourth line doesn't play a lot of minutes and Dandenault will be used more than 8-10 minutes a game. He absolutely can play 20-25 minutes IMO, 10 on offense, 10-15 on defense, what's wrong with that? He can play the PK and Streit will miss some shifts. I'm not worry about Streit at all. Give him the PP and half the shifts with Bouillon and it would be perfect, IMO. Lapierre could be brought and Streit scratched at some point, but right now, I believe that Streit deserve to play and none of the other dmen deserve to sit, so IMO, it is the only solution.
View Public Profile
Visit JordanStaal#1Fan's homepage!
Find More Posts by JordanStaal#1Fan