View Single Post
10-03-2013, 07:40 AM
Blue Blooded
Registered User
Blue Blooded's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Stockholm
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,810
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ola View Post
It is a bit silly, and especially if you match a team a team like many NHL teams are matched.

But there is also a mis-perception that even a majority of all NHL teams differs that much in terms of ice time 5 on 5 the first two periods of a NHL game. For some coaches, it is relevant to talk about top 2 lines and bottom 2 lines, but for many its just not relevant to get into that discussions with many others. It can be 1+3. It can be 1/2/3A/3B for the first half of a game then 1/3b/2-3b for the latter half, almost as a norm.

The main diffrence is always the special teams. That is a point I wanted to make. Its impossible to score much without PP time, and up to a third of a players ice time comes from special teams. Then the third period gets broken up in many many games. You protect the lead or go after a lead. In those games 1-4 don't matter, 10 guys play alot more than the other 8 in the 3rd. The exceptions are games where one team got a 3 goal lead or something really.
So much this, and a player's effectiveness can differ hugely between 5v5 play and special teams since it is a very different brand of hockey.

For example, only ~10 players usually break 50 points 5v5 in an 82 game season. Nash and Stepan scoring as much as they did last season with our struggling PP was therefore extremely impressive.

Blue Blooded is offline   Reply With Quote