Thread: Proposal: Fleury for Miller
View Single Post
Old
10-08-2013, 10:02 AM
  #96
vabm8
Injured Reserve
 
vabm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 26,218
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PensBrony 6 9 View Post
Does anyone else think we should just wait and sign lundquist and maybe trade letang and fleury (and maybe a 1st or a highly rated prospect) for a true number one defense prospect like carlson? letang isn't getting any younger and i think we all know what we have already in fleury (not much). lunquist is a clear improvement over both fleury and miller and our d will be solidified for years to come with the prospect (who also won't be taking up over 7 million in cap space like letang)
Yes on Lundvist, no on Letang. I think depending on the cap and what he wants we could make Lundvist work. Lundvist . IDK why you would want to lose Letang on the chance that a prospect could be a cheaper version of him in x amount of years.

vabm8 is offline