View Single Post
10-18-2013, 09:57 AM
Registered User
PavelBure9's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 376
vCash: 500
I don't get people killing the Pouliot move. It was a low risk high reward type move that obviously has not worked the past 6 games. If anything, he's either waived and claimed, or he goes down to the pack with a small burden for the year. On Sathers end, it was a good move looking at his 5 v 5 numbers. We know he's maddeningly inconsistent, that's why we were able to get him for peanuts. If he is this terrible after 20 games, he's a goner. Same goes for Pyatt, who arguably has been even worse then Pouliot. These guys have to perform or their gone. But I don't understand people who consistently kill Sather for moves that are smart from an economical standpoint that have low to no risk for this signing.

Right now he's terrible, give it 20 games and Krieder will have to take his spot.

PavelBure9 is offline