View Single Post
10-20-2013, 02:00 PM
Registered Boozer
mrmyheadhurts's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,090
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
Even with the Sedin twins,the PP stinks for Tortorella.
Originally Posted by Bullseyes View Post

Their PP wasn't very good last season either. It was slightly better than the Rangers last season (15.8% to 15.7%).
Originally Posted by RangerBoy View Post
Some people said the Rangers PP sucked because the team had no talent. The VAN PP missed Ryan Kesler last season. Vigneault and his assistant in Vancouver(Newell Brown)share the same philosophy. Right-handed shots. Brown is an assistant with the Coyotes now.

Read more:

Kesler played 17 games last season. He is healthy this season. The PP stinks. The two architects in NY are now in Vancouver. What's their excuse for the bad PP? Maybe they don't what they are doing. They don't share the right handed philosophy which is what Vigneault has brought to the Rangers.

The Rangers are down to one righty(Stepan)with the injury to Callahan. The Rangers need to add more righty shots.
Just for some perspective from a Canucks fan. While the PP has failed to produced it has looked much better this year so far, generating a lot of quality chances with better movement. Much like the Rangers, it's too early in the season to make any meaningful determinations. Also, keep in mind that former Stars head coach, Gulutzan is running the PP, not Sullivan.

I'm also of the belief that personnel is a much higher determining factor than coaching when it comes to the PP. To be honest, the PP is pretty much the Sedins thing to run; if they're going, the PP is going.

The other issue with the Canucks is that they have the fewest PP opportunities in the NHL, which has been an ongoing trend the last few seasons. Take the Pens game, the Canucks dominated possession and the shots for much of the game, yet the Pens enjoyed a 4-1 PP advantage. When you're only getting one PP all game, it's hard to find your rhythm. It was an issue last year and it is an issue early on this season.

As for Torts, it is interesting to note some differences and let me say up front, I liked AV as a coach. The main thing I've noticed as a strength that Torts has, that AV always struggled with, is in-game adjustments. Torts seems to have a better feel for who's going, who's not going, and what buttons to push to wake the team up from a slumber. For better or worse, the Canucks are certainly a more aggressive team under Torts but you can see the team is still in an adjustment period, much like the Rangers I'm sure. My only gripe would be the number of odd man rushes we seem to be giving up and the amount of time and space we give to teams in our own end. Every good team collapses to the net, but it feels like the Canucks are still figuring out just how much under Torts.

And yes, there has been more shot blocking.

mrmyheadhurts is offline