View Single Post
10-20-2013, 02:37 PM
Lafleurs Guy
Global Moderator
Lafleurs Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 43,029
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Genesis76 View Post
Oh i meant I was not impressed by the players in general with their individual skills and involvement (1 on 1 battles, passing, decision making), but they were still good in the defensive zone as a team they played the defensive system pretty well in general (not always though, they did get lucky on a few occasions).

Since you don't like how our defense is built and since we only gave 1 legit goal in 37 shots I think its unfair you don't give our D more credit.
You think giving up 37 shots is a sign of good D?

Personally I don't think our D was horrible. We were on the PK a lot but I certainly wouldn't call our D 'good' last night. Most in the game thread ripped our D apart and said that we sucked. One 'legit' goal on 37 shots as you put it... the D should get credit? How much credit should the goalie get? He was pretty good wasn't he?

I split the difference and went with mediocre. I think that's the right call here.

Lafleurs Guy is offline