View Single Post
Old
10-21-2013, 01:28 PM
  #129
loneranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
vCash: 500
Seeing as the whole team isn't producing much, it would be too quick to judge individual players.

Half the players on this team have failed to produce points. Only two players have scored more than one goal (Richards (4) and Callahan(3)). There are 11 goals divided on 6 scorers. 18 assists on 7 players. Thats 39 points total, being produced by a total of 11 players alone. Averaging a low 3.5 points per game. Also, Hankypanky may have his worst streak in god knows how long, with a GGA of 3.45. This whole team is underperforming.

Compared to, for example Colorado, where every player has at least one point to show for - and the points are divided more evenly between players - this is horrendous.

My point is that if the team sucks overall, it's easier to blame individual players. This whole team is lacking, only having 2-5-0 and bad play in lost matches to show for. Maybe the fault lies with the managment, not in the players?

I don't really care about the individuals, as long as the team is playing good hockey.

loneranger is offline