View Single Post
Old
12-09-2006, 01:19 AM
  #45
Rayne*
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,298
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FF de Mars View Post
I know. I think Naslund has as much trade value as Koivu. But, the Canucks don't have a winning team and could use prospects and picks, since they are not going to make it this year. If I'm thinking for the Canucks, I'm thinking : Why not stack up a future powerhouse instead of having a bad team ? Trading Naslund for good prospects does that.
Doesn't Naslund have a NTC? Besides, your lines make no sense. Grabovski is not ready for the big team, nevermind the 2nd line centre job, and Ryder doesn't even play LW.

Rayne* is offline   Reply With Quote