View Single Post
Old
10-28-2013, 08:00 PM
  #28
ocarina
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,415
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MollyMollyOxenFree View Post
According to you, the article gave "good in-depth analysis". In the article the author mentioned the +/- stat. Therefore, both of your opinions can easily be dismissed in the future.
Did you not even see how he mentioned it?

Quote:
This is not as bad as it looks. First of all, the Rangers have actually attempted more shots than their opponents with Staal on the ice. His minus-9 rating is actually a result of New York scoring on just 3.2 percent of their shots (at even strength) while their opponents are finding twine on 11.9 percent (source: Behind the Net).
He is actually explaining how the +/- stat for Staal is misleading. Did you even understand the article? Or make any effort to read it?

ocarina is offline   Reply With Quote