View Single Post
10-28-2013, 08:00 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,415
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by MollyMollyOxenFree View Post
According to you, the article gave "good in-depth analysis". In the article the author mentioned the +/- stat. Therefore, both of your opinions can easily be dismissed in the future.
Did you not even see how he mentioned it?

This is not as bad as it looks. First of all, the Rangers have actually attempted more shots than their opponents with Staal on the ice. His minus-9 rating is actually a result of New York scoring on just 3.2 percent of their shots (at even strength) while their opponents are finding twine on 11.9 percent (source: Behind the Net).
He is actually explaining how the +/- stat for Staal is misleading. Did you even understand the article? Or make any effort to read it?

ocarina is offline   Reply With Quote