View Single Post
Old
10-30-2013, 12:26 PM
  #32
billybudd
5 Mike Rupps
 
billybudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,517
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco MacArthur View Post
Is it really that stable, though? I understand that the article's author said as much, but the link:



Doesn't really have a lot of gradation in it. Why did he make the graph go all the way down to a save percentage of 0.500? All that does is make the useful range of information entirely obfuscated.

Anyhow, if I had to eyeball it (and it appears that I'm forced to) then the range of save percentages on "clean shots" varies between 0.940 and 0.980. That doesn't seem like particularly stable to me.
One of the datapoints for deflections was that low.



Guess is he wanted to standardize the various graphs to show how much more variance there was for (shot type X) in comparison to "clean shots."

billybudd is offline   Reply With Quote