View Single Post
Old
11-01-2013, 10:24 AM
  #116
dyzfunctioned
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 685
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by duul View Post
Why are you neglecting to say we also would get Tyutin and Dubinsky in the deal I proposed? Tyutin could be our #1 until Nurse steps up and Dubinsky is an absolute warrior. Tell me what team looks better, please.

Hall-RNH-Eberle
Perron-Gagner-Hemsky
Joensuu-Gordon-Yakupov
Gazdic-Arcobello-Eager

Smid-Petry
Ference-J.Schultz
N.Schultz-Belov

or

Hall-RNH-Hemsky
Dubinsky-Gagner-Yakupov
Perron-Gordon-Foligno
Joensuu-Arcobello-Eager

Tyutin-Petry
Ference-J.Schultz
N.Schultz-Belov

The only way you could possibly not prefer the second team is if you've never seen Tyutin, Dubinsky, and Foligno play. Our team is light years better after this deal.
You seem to like to play people out of position... Foligno has almost always played LW, Gaborik has almost always played RW. They prefer to play there. Gaborik spent some time at LW with New York and CBJ experimented with it as well. And in those lineups you propose, our first line gets worse, our second line is basically status quo, if not worse, while our 3rd line is a marginal improvement and our 4th line improves greatly, but who cares, it's our 4th line.

dyzfunctioned is offline