FA Signings, Trade Rumors and Proposals Thread IX:
View Single Post
11-03-2013, 12:41 PM
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by
First to your points.
1) Statistically speaking... we are well on track for a bottom three finish...
2) Ekblad isn't the guaranteed 1st overall guy. Even Jones dropped to 4th. Buffalo, IMO would take a forward.
3) Ekblad is more like to have a Jones/Doughty rookie impact than a Larsson/Murray type.
I don't know why you want to trade picks and prospects that have top pairing potential for #3 d-men. Ference was the #3 guy on a cup winning team Petry would be a #3 guy on many good teams. We have lots of guys who can play a 2nd pairing role, we dont need that anymore. We need studs back there.
I'm not trading Nurse or our potential Ekblad pick for anything less than that
okay fair enough, i get your point for sure.... totally understandable.... my point is: are you willing to wait 3-4 years for nurse or ekblad to become a 1st pairing guy? (if they ever get there) i'm not, i guess that is the difference
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by McJadeddog