View Single Post
Old
11-14-2013, 06:20 PM
  #91
lou4gehrig
Registered User
 
lou4gehrig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcv View Post
Parros played less than 25 minutes this season and he is -5, so yes, he is a problem. I agree that Prust - White - Moen is a good 4th line, but I like having Prust on the 3rd line, so a guy like Halpern would be great.
I think the point he's making is that contenders top two lines and top pairing D are greater than ours.

Crosby-Neal-Malkin-whoever > than Galchenyuk-Eller-Plekanec

Or Kane-Toews-Hossa > us

I think Galchenyuk and Eller have the potenial but right now our franchise center is playing wing and Plek is preferred in many other situations.

We need to select the future core and let them dominate the team. Right now they lose ice time to mediocre vets.

As for the fourth line, that's BS. The Penguins, Blackhawks and Bruins roll their 4th lines every single season yet remain contenders. Why? Top two lines and top pairin D remain the same.

lou4gehrig is offline   Reply With Quote