UFC 167 GSP vs. Hendricks (UPD Post 774: GSP announces semi-retirement/title forfeit)
View Single Post
11-17-2013, 04:04 PM
Join Date: Apr 2013
Originally Posted by
He never had it, he let go to try and gain better positioning, if you think GSP let him go because he tapped, don't you think GSP/GSP's corner would have made mention of this during the fight, I mean come on.
People claiming damage isn't a criteria for scoring are using a copout, and it's not even true. Effective striking includes damage, and impact from strikes, not just quantity, but quality, quality is more important.
I see this all the time to justify these silly decisions we see lately, but it's not true and has never been the intention of the unified rules. IT's BS.
If by damage you mean that for exemple if i hit somebody and he got a bruise from that hit i get more points then if i hit him the exact same way and he have not apparent mark on his face your wrong
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Cedream