UFC 167 GSP vs. Hendricks (UPD Post 774: GSP announces semi-retirement/title forfeit)
View Single Post
11-17-2013, 05:09 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Originally Posted by
If by damage you mean that for exemple if i hit somebody and he got a bruise from that hit i get more points then if i hit him the exact same way and he have not apparent mark on his face your wrong
Literally zero to do with facial damage, some bruise easier than others. know many here are proud of gsp and will defend him no matter what, you can still be proud of him and admit he lost.
By quality, it's what punches are clean and hurt. GSP's jabs had nothing on the counter uppercuts and overhand lefts that Hendricks was landing. GSP should land more shots, based on style alone, the fact hendricks landed as many shots, many with way more conviction tells the real story. GSP was hurt more than once, hendricks never was.
Hendricks controlled the action and was even stronger in the clinch, dictating who was up against the cage ect, often reversing positioning when gsp tried for the td's. It wasn't really close, Hendricks laid a beat down on him.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by habsfanatics*