View Single Post
11-18-2013, 03:56 PM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,752
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
The problem is that it seems like you think Nash will automatically make that line better. Just because he's a better player doesn't mean he's a better fit for that line. Plus that line doing well, why not create depth and have 2 or 3 dangerous lines?
You can go either way when Nash first comes back. Im definitely not opposed to putting Nash on the 3rd line to start to see if he can get Brassard going. But sooner or later, Nash will be on the 1st line getting big minutes.

But perhaps more importantly, I don't view that Kreider-Stepan-Zuccarello line as something thats so dangerous that you cant break them up.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote